Klopfenstein, K. (2004, December 12). The advanced placement expansion of the 1990s: How did traditionally underserved students fare?
Howley, C. B., & Howley, A. A. (2004, September 24). School size and the influence of socioeconomic status on student achievement: Confronting the threat of size bias in national data sets. Lee, V. E. (2004, September 24) Effects of high-school size on student outcomes: Response to Howley and Howley.Akiba, M., & Reichardt, R. (2004, April 24). What Predicts the Mobility of Elementary School Leaders? An Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Colorado. Bickel, R., & Maynard, A. S. (2004). Group and Interaction Effects with "No Child Left Behind": Gender and Reading in a Poor, Appalachian District.
Milanowski, A. (2003, December 27). An exploration of the pay levels needed to attract students with mathematics, science and technology skills to a career in K-12 teaching.
Huang, G., & Yu, B. (2002). District Fiscal Policy and Student Achievement: Evidence from Combined NAEP-CCD Data.
Livingston, D., Livingston, S. (2002, December 6). Failing Georgia: The Case Against the Ban on Social Promotion.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. (2002).
Koretz, D. (2002). Testing and Diversity in Postsecondary Education: The Case of California.
Fischman, G. (2001). Globalization, Consumers, Citizens, and the “Private School Advantage”in Argentina (1985-1999).
Bickel, R., & Howley, C. (2000). The Influence of Scale on School Performance: A Multi-Level Extension of the Matthew Principle.
Henderson, W., & Royster, W. (2000). The Appalachian Rural Systemic Initiative: Improving Science and Mathematics Student Achievement in Economically Disadvantaged Rural Counties in Central Appalachia Through a School-Based, Teacher Partner Approach.
Bickel, R., Tomasek, T., & Eagle, T. (2000). Top-Down, Routinized Reform in Low-Income, Rural Schools: NSF's Appalachian Rural Systemic Initiative.
Supriadi, D. (1999). Restructuring the Schoolbook Provision System in Indonesia: Some Recent Initiatives.